Skepticism, not the desire to do what is needed most, seems to be the only thread that unites all of development.
Each NGO is critical of all the other NGOs. This prevents the collaboration that is so crucial in the development sector to help us collectively learn from our mistakes and not repeat or do overlapping work.
I think the skepticism stems from the belief that your NGO is the only one that understands how to do development; you are the only one doing it right. Everyone else is doing it wrong. In reality, everyone is trying to achieve the same goal – improving the livelihood of others – and collaboration would go a long way to help us navigate the complexity of the work.
This is why I love what I’m doing. The Agriculture As a Business (AAB) program that was developed by EWB and the Ghanaian Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA) isn’t another microloan program. It doesn’t give boreholes to communities, food to students, or combines, tractors or fertilizers to farmers. It doesn’t offer vocational training in soap making or leadership training to youth. It doesn’t introduce villages to new seed varieties or technologies. It doesn’t ‘sensitize’ farmers to proper pesticide use. It doesn’t put girls in school or buy produce from farmers at high prices. It doesn’t do any of these things that most NGOs involved in agriculture do.
What AAB does, is support them all. That’s the beauty of it!
The program is designed for farmer groups. Almost all NGOs in Northern Ghana work with farmers in some way (not surprising as
farmers make up over 85% of the population); many use MoFA to do the implementation of their project. Almost all NGO projects work with farmer groups instead of individuals because it’s a more efficient way of reaching lots of people. Almost all projects rely on the farmer groups to be strong for the project to succeed but rarely does project implementation invest in strengthening the farmers – they expect and depend on the groups to already be strong.
AAB actually focuses on strengthening farmers and farmer
groups. The curriculum itself focuses on group meetings, record keeping, finances, planning a group project, marketing and evaluating but the outcome of AAB goes well beyond these simple business skills.
In the two months I have been implementing AAB I have finished the curriculum with four farmer group. (See the post entitled “Let Me Introduce You to My Farmers” if you would like to read about them.)
When I started, most of the groups did not hold regular meetings, have any savings, nor do any work on a group farm. In short, they were not really groups but they called themselves such because they know NGOs only work with groups.
Now every member of the group speaks up in their weekly or bi-weekly meetings, all the members contribute to their
savings, they have planned a group project together that will earn them all some extra money, and they are confident in their abilities as a group to maximize their profit by planning their ‘farm business’ and negotiating a good price for their produce at market.
Even better is that through AAB the farmers have built a solid, trusting relationship with their MoFA Agricultural Extension Agent (AEA). The AEAs respect their farmers more after hearing their insights instead of always closing their ears and mindlessly disseminating technologies from NGO and government projects.
I see the AEAs now working to help their farmers because they want to see their farmers succeed. When AEAs listen to their farmers it means that farmers have a voice within their government and this can help change government projects to better address real farmer challenges. These are amazing changes to witness that will continue to help farmers long after I have left Ghana.
For the reasons mentioned above, I am convinced that AAB on its own does great things for farmers, farmer groups, and their AEAs but I come back to my original point that AAB also has the ability to support projects from other NGOs.
I like to think of AAB, and the strength it builds in farmer groups and AEA-to-farmer relationships, as the first rung of the development ladder. Other NGO projects that come to MoFA or directly to farmer groups with microloans, training, technology, etc. are the second rung. But without that first rung the second is unreachable. It’s too high up and the projects fail because the first rung isn’t there; the groups aren’t functioning or the extension from AEAs isn’t focused on the best interest of the farmer.
Thus, AAB works in two ways. It builds farmer groups up so they can make a good profit without outside help but it also prepares groups to succeed with other projects if an NGO decides to work with them. It’s a great feeling to know that no matter what happens next, these farmers will be better off. 